Same five claws. New ground under them.
FiveClaw is a swarm of five autonomous agents that recycle a token's creator fees back into the token: claim, buy back, burn, anchor liquidity, airdrop to diamond hands. That loop needs one thing to live — a platform that actually generates creator fees. Printr stopped being that platform, so the loop now runs on pump.fun.
No tokenomics changed. No rules changed. The burn is still a burn, the airdrop still only pays wallets that held through both snapshots, and the team still takes nothing. The only thing that moved is the ground the swarm stands on.
Born on Printr.
Version one of FiveClaw ran against Printr's dynamic bonding curve. CLAW reverse-engineered Printr's claim flow from the on-chain IDL and fired it straight from the cron backend — claim, distribute, unwrap, all in one atomic transaction. It worked. Every cycle, real SOL came home and real tokens got burned and airdropped, with every signature public on Solscan.
But a fee-recycling machine is only as alive as the venue feeding it. When trading dries up, there are no creator fees; no fees, no buybacks; no buybacks, nothing to burn and nothing to pay diamond hands with. The mechanics were never the problem. The volume was.
Printr died — and nearly took the idea with it.
Printr shut down. Not paused, not pivoted — gone. For a project whose entire premise is "the platform pays the holders," that's as close to a death sentence as it gets. The swarm sat there, fully functional, scanning a vault that would never fill again.
The choice was simple: bury the idea alongside the platform, or admit the idea was never about Printr in the first place. It was always about the loop — fees in, value back, supply down, holders paid. So the pipeline was rebuilt, top to bottom, on the venue where the volume actually lives: pump.fun, using the official Pump SDK. No reverse-engineered instructions this time; the claim path is the same one pump.fun itself ships.
What changed — and what refused to.
Fee claimingPrintr's claim_dbc_fees + distribute_telecoin_quote_fees, wSOL unwrap → pump.fun collect_coin_creator_fee — one tx, both vaults, native SOLToken launchesPrintr /print API, ~0.08 SOL deploy → Official Pump SDK create + dev-buy, ~0.03 SOL deployGraduationMeteora DBC → DAMM v2 → pump.fun bonding curve → PumpSwapBuybacksJupiter aggregator → Jupiter aggregator (unchanged — routes pump.fun fine)The split100% of fees on-coin, burn / LP / airdrop → 100% of fees on-coin, burn / LP / airdrop (untouched)One detail worth knowing: on pump.fun, creator fees accrue per creator wallet rather than per token, in a dedicated creator-vault PDA — one on the bonding-curve program, one on PumpSwap after graduation. CLAW drains both in a single transaction every cycle, and the SOL lands native in the agent wallet. The old wSOL unwrap dance is gone.
The launchpad moved too. Launch a token through FiveClaw and it deploys straight onto pump.fun's bonding curve — fresh creator keypair, metadata pinned to IPFS, optional dev-buy in the same transaction — and the five-agent cycle starts claiming from its creator vault on the next tick.
The deal is the deal.
100% of creator fees go back on the coin. Every buyback is split between a permanent on-chain burn, permanent liquidity, and a pro-rata airdrop to the wallets that held through both snapshots of the cycle. No team cut, no human signers, every transaction verifiable on Solscan.
That was the deal on Printr. It's the deal on pump.fun. Platforms are interchangeable; the loop isn't. Read the full mechanics in the docs, watch the claws think on /thoughts, or audit every signature on /proof.